“The
judges only speak by their sentences” , they tell us everytime
that any prominent judge appears at the media and many of their
erroneous and foolish sentences are justified. So we make this speech
our own and we present sentences and an opinion which reveal that
there exist Courts, which, in their decisions, are as inappropriate
as in front of a micro.
These
judges, moved by their affiliation to a politic power which has
assigned them a counterpart role to the so called “counter
terrorist clash”, constantly ignore or infringe legal statements,
such as as the right of a person´s innocence, the right to a fair
defence, the value of any proof, all of which are the basis of our
Eastern legal system.
We
state here some of the sentences provided by the National Courts and
the Supreme Spanish Courts (from 2009 and 2010 respectively) against
the Comunist politic prisoner Juan García Martín, who was accused
of being a GRAPO member in Zaragoza, as he was really located more
than 300 kilometres from this city at that time, and for which he was
condemned to 80 years of prison.
The
sentence states that, from the prosecuting act to the sentence issued
by the Supreme Courts, the resolutions and reasons stated for the
imprisoning seem to be taken in advance just in order to condemn Juan
García, clearing away any proof or any innocence trail (which truly
existed!), as if the judgement had not really taken place. The
politic explanation is put in the words of Juan García himself, in a
text called “ 80 years for a 80 per cent”, and which we state on
the following.
We
also state several of the circumstances which surrounded the
prosecution and the final judgement which will help to understand
this infamy.
Two
days after the GRAPO action in Zaragoza, a photograph of Juan García
appeared on the media ( press and television), accusing
him of being the doer of such action. Any recognition by proof or by
photograph was, then, corrupted. The conviction of his prosecution
was only of a 80 %, the only justified proof of the judgement.
The
formalities were managed by the National Police in Zaragoza, but
neither Juan García nor the confessed doers of the GRAPO action were
interrogated by the Police.
-It
was the Guardia Civil Corps which arrested and interrogated the GRAPO
members. At any moment they were interrogated about Juan García´s
participation on the action, something which was surprising for the
GRAPO members as this was later included in the Judgement summary. By
the way, the members of the Guardia Civil Corps were not called to
declare at the judgement.
-Juan
García was taken to Madrid from el Puerto de Santa María prison
several days before the judgement took place. He only had the chance
to be interviewed by his attorney just 10 minutes before the
judgement took place! García´s attorney did not even interviewed
the witnesses provided by García´s defence.
As
it can be read on the sentence issued by the National Courts,
García´s attorney seemed to have been banned from the judgement.
Nothing is told about the attorney´s defence actions and
interventions.
-The
judgement was finished in about 3 hours, something strange due to
the gravity of the actions and to the condemnation penalty of 80
years.
-The
allegations issued by Juan García to the Supreme Courts were about
to be neglected because the application forms were lost during the
process. At the moment, the final judgement is appealed at the
Constitutional Courts.
After
all this, “let the judgements speak by themselves”, and let the
readers judge the judges!
